Unfair Competition, Trade Secrets and Restrictive Covenants

Williams & Connolly’s Unfair Competition, Trade Secrets and Restrictive Covenants practice group regularly represents companies and individuals in connection with unfair competition lawsuits and related claims. Our experience includes representations involving allegations of misappropriation or improper disclosure of trade secrets and confidential information, breaches of non-competition, non-solicitation, non-disclosure and other restrictive covenants, misuse or infringement of intellectual property by competitors, breaches of fiduciary duties, tortious interference with customer or employment contracts, and improper hiring practices – including so-called “raiding.” Our lawyers have experience litigating these and other related issues in state and federal courts, as well as before arbitral panels, including those convened by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”), American Arbitration Association and the International Centre for Dispute Resolution (“AAA/ICDR”) and JAMS (formerly known as Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services).

Representative Experience

Though all cases vary and none is predictive, the firm’s experience includes:

  • Successful representation of an international commercial real estate data firm, in copyright and unfair competition litigation in federal court in Missouri and Pennsylvania, and coordinating related lawsuits, including obtaining ex parte civil search and seizure orders, against the defendant’s agents in The Philippines and India.  In the Missouri litigation, the firm’s client won a judgment of $500 million, the largest ever recorded judgment for copyrighted images, as well as a broad permanent injunction.
  •  Lead trial counsel for a global medical company for the defense in state court in Wilmington, DE, in a commercial dispute involving contract and trade secrets claims in excess of $400 million.  After summary judgment for client on the trade secrets claims, the jury returned a defense verdict on the contract claims.
  • Lead plaintiff’s counsel for a global conglomerate pursuing claims for theft of trade secrets.  The firm’s client secured a permanent injunction and return of all of the disputed material.
  • Representing an automobile dealership group in a nationwide class arbitration alleging unfair trade practices.  The Court issued a rare decision vacating an arbitrator’s class certification award.
  • Successfully trying to verdict a case on behalf of a major electronics company in which a competitor sought over $450 million claiming misappropriation of advanced interconnection technology.
  • Achieving singular success in two separate lengthy representations of individuals charged under the Federal Economic Espionage Act (“EEA”), a law that criminalizes the theft of trade secrets. In each case, the government ended up dismissing the case against the firm’s client with prejudice.
  • Enforcing restrictive covenants for a publicly traded medical technology company in federal court.  The firm’s client secured permanent injunctive relief on its claims.
  • Acting for a global private equity firm in a trade secrets case in Texas state court involving the acquisition of the largest marina in the United States. After challenging the lawsuit on jurisdictional grounds the matter settled on favorable terms.
  • Defending a global private equity firm in trade secrets litigation in Arizona federal court and New York state court over the hiring of a senior real estate investment manager. After the firm’s clients defeated a request for a temporary restraining order and, after filing motions to dismiss, the case settled on favorable terms.
  • Representing a large corporate client as plaintiff in litigation against a competitor in federal court in Texas relating to the unauthorized use of proprietary images and data. The plaintiff obtained a permanent injunction and a seven-figure damages award.
  • Prevailing at trial for a major defense contractor, which won a judgment worth in excess of $275 million and defeated in full counterclaims asserting misappropriation of trade secrets that sought approximately $750 million.
  • Representing a large corporation as plaintiff against a former employee in litigation brought in federal court alleging violations of non-compete and non-solicitation agreements.  

Williams & Connolly Recognized for IP: Trade Secrets in 2022 Edition of The Legal 500

Williams & Connolly Recognized for IP: Trade Secrets in 2022 Edition of The Legal 500

Reach of Defend Trade Secrets Act & State Trade Secret Laws

Reach of Defend Trade Secrets Act & State Trade Secret Laws
back to top