Although all cases vary and none is predictive, Lisa’s experience includes:

Supreme Court

• Starbucks Corp. v. McKinney, No. 23-367 (2024) – Secured ruling that district courts must apply the traditional four factors for preliminary injunctions—not a relaxed, pro-agency standard—when considering the National Labor Relations Board’s requests for preliminary injunctions under Section 10(j) of the National Labor Relations Act.
• Snyder v. United States, No. 23-108 (2024) – Secured holding that the government’s most-prosecuted statute requires a quid pro quo in order to convict state or local officials of bribery.
• Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. VIP Products LLC, No. 22-148 (2023) – Secured holding that a defendant’s “humorous” or “expressive” use of another’s trademark did not insulate the defendant from liability for infringing or diluting the trademark. 
• Gonzalez v. Google LLC, No. 21-1333 (2023) and Twitter, Inc. v. Taamneh, No. 21-1496 (2023) – Successfully represented Google in case concerning the Antiterrorism Act (ATA), 18 U.S.C. § 2333 and in persuading the Court not to address the scope of Section 230(c)(1) of the Communications Decency Act.
• Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. Goldsmith, No. 21-869 (2023) – Secured holding that the Andy Warhol Foundation’s use of a copyrighted photograph does not favor the Foundation’s fair use defense to copyright infringement.
• Mahanoy Area School Dist. v. B.L., No. 20-255 (2021). Secured ruling recognizing student’s First Amendment rights and holding that schools can regulate off-campus speech in limited circumstances. 
• United States Patent & Trademark Office v. Booking.com, No. 19-46 (2020).  Secured holding that the addition of a generic top-level domain (".com") to an otherwise generic term can create a protectable trademark. 
• Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. Fossil, Inc., No. 18-1233 (2020).  Unanimous ruling holding that plaintiffs in trademark infringement suits are not required to show that a defendant willfully infringed the plaintiff's trademark as a precondition to a profits award. 　
• Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Christian, 590 U.S. ___ (2020).  Secured ruling holding that Superfund site landowners cannot sue defendants to implement an alternative cleanup plan that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has not approved.
• BNSF Railway Company v. Loos, 586 U.S. ____ (2019).  Secured ruling that client’s payment to an employee for working time lost due to an on-the-job injury is taxable “compensation” under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act.*
• Advocate Health Care Network v. Stapleton, 581 U. S. ____ (2017). Unanimous decision for client regarding ERISA's church plan exemption for religious employers.*
• Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl, 570 U.S. 637 (2013). Clients prevailed in a child custody dispute involving the federal Indian Child Welfare Act. The case marked only the second time the Supreme Court had considered the scope of ICWA, and "Baby Girl" was reunited with her adoptive parents.*
• Tarrant Regional Water District v. Herrmann, 569 U.S. 614 (2013). Secured decision protecting key western water compacts that do not expressly authorize cross-border diversions.*
• Marx v. General Revenue Corp., 568 U.S. 371 (2013). Secured ruling in favor of client in Fair Debt Collection Practices Act case.*
• Astra USA, Inc. v. Santa Clara County, 563 U.S. 110 (2011). Unanimous decision for client that resolved important questions for government contract litigation involving third-party beneficiary challenges.*
• Henderson v. Shinseki, 562 U.S. 428 (2011). Unanimous decision in favor of war veteran client regarding veteran disability benefits.*

Appellate

• Greenberg v. Lehocky, 81 F.4th 376 (3d Cir. 2023): Successfully represented Pennsylvania Supreme Court Disciplinary Board in obtaining dismissal for lack of standing of First Amendment and due process challenge to attorney antidiscrimination rule.
• In Re: Zofran (Ondansetron) Products Liability Litigation, 57 F.4th 327 (1st Cir. 2023).  Secured affirmance of summary judgment in favor of client in multi-district product liability litigation involving more than 400 plaintiffs.
• Glaxo Group Ltd. v. DRIT (Del. Supreme Court): In a landmark implied-covenant contractual case before the Delaware Supreme Court, won reversal of a jury verdict against GSK awarding $57 million in royalty payments.
• Wendy Dolin v. Glaxosmithkline, 901 F.3d 803 (7th Cir. 2018).  Successfully represented drug manufacturer asserting federal preemption defense against failure to warn claim.*
• Williams v. Gaye, No. 15-56880 (9th Cir. 2018).  Successfully defended copyright verdict in favor of Marvin Gaye’s heirs in copyright dispute.*
• Pro-Football, Inc. v. Blackhorse et al., No. 15-1874 (4th Cir. 2017). Successfully represented the Washington Redskins in its appeal of the government's decision to cancel the Team's trademarks.*
• AngioScore, Inc. v. TriReme Medical, LLC, Nos. 2016-1126 (Fed. Cir. 2016). Successfully overturned $20 million trial verdict against medical device manufacturer.*
• MM Steel, L.P. v. JSW Steel (USA) Inc., 806 F.3d 835 (5th Cir. 2015). Overturned $156 million trial antitrust verdict against steel manufacturer.*
• Price v. Philip Morris, Inc., 43 N.E.3d 53 (Ill. S. Ct. 2015). Successfully represented Philip Morris before the Illinois Supreme Court in an appeal from a $10 billion judgment concerning light cigarettes. The high Court held that the lower state court lacked authority to vacate its prior judgment and dismissed the case.*
• SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. Abbott Laboratories, 740 F.3d 471 (9th Cir. 2013). Successfully represented GlaxoSmithKline in landmark case finding that the Equal Protection Clause bars peremptory challenges of jurors based on sexual orientation.*

*Representation occurred prior to Lisa’s return to Williams & Connolly.